March 2009 Archives

Halo 3

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

I'm well behind the curve with this, but as I mentioned in my Halo Wars post, I might play Halo 3 if I enjoyed Halo Wars enough. This turned out to be the case.

To start with I found the game surprisingly frustrating. I was playing on easy mode, but it was anything but straightforward. I was killed at least half a dozen times in the first level and found that the available weapons were not really powerful enough to take out the sturdy Covenant Brutes with any level of efficiency, leaving me hiding behind rocks to recharge my shield quite often. This was not the easing into the game I had hoped for.

The second level nearly made me give up entirely. It was a little easier (or perhaps I'd become more used to the style of play required), but this level showed up another major shortcoming in the game design, namely navigation. One mission objective asked me to go to a hangar to clear out some Covenant invaders, but neglected to tell me how to get there. I hung around in the command centre to see if any of the marines hanging around would show me the way, but no help was forthcoming - in fact I kept getting told "Chief, get to the hangar NOW!" After some aimless wandering around, a directional arrow appeared in the HUD which showed me the way. After clearing the hangar, a marine helpfully said "Follow me!" to the next objective. Where was he when I needed him earlier?

Frustrations were put aside on the next level as I got to drive like a lunatic in a Warthog running over the very same guys who had been wiping me out minutes previously. Most satisfying. This reminded me that my favourite bits of the earlier games were the vehicle sections. As Halo 3 progressed, it showed the same pattern of difficult on foot sections, and really cool driving and flying sections where I was kicking bottom! More cool stuff followed, such as taking out a giant Scarab tank.

Overall the difficulty level peaked in odd places throughout the game - the Flood being a particular problem due to their numbers and resistance to the weedy guns I could use. Occasionally I was able to grab a huge plasma cannon for a little while which was fun.

Plot wise the game certainly made more sense than Halo 2, with clear progression throughout. The ending was fairly satisfying, though the post credits "teaser" left things wide open for more (not counting the Halo 2 timeframe Halo:ODST). It would have been nice to have an optional "The story so far..." option to watch at the start of the game though. I occasionally found it tricky to hear what characters were saying over the bombastic soundtrack though - some of us have to play at night without waking up a wife and child!).

Overall, Halo 3 is definitely a game where (for me) the fun bits are the easier sections where you do cool stuff, and the harder stuff is just frustrating rather than challenging. I don't feel much temptation to replay the game on a higher difficulty level (even though most of the achievements can't be unlocked in easy mode, another punishing feature). It just feels like this is a pure hardcore game, which totally goes against its mass market advertising and sales figures. I can imagine a lot of people got fed up on the first couple of levels and gave up with it, which is such a shame for a game with such obvious love and attention spent on it.

Halo Wars

| 0 Comments | 1 TrackBack

Long ago, on a giant black and green monolith under my television, I played Halo: Combat Evolved. It was a nice experience with some annoyances. At some point later I played Halo 2 on the same machine (and the same television for that matter). It had the same nice AI and combat, but was even more annoying to play, with a ridiculously overcomplicated story told entirely through glitchy cutscenes - the less said about the abrupt ending the better. I reckoned I would never play a Halo game again after that. I got a free copy of Halo 3 (the special edition no less!) some time ago, and it remains in its box unplayed on my newer, smaller black monolith and much nicer HD television to this day.

However, I recently got a copy of Halo Wars and was intrigued by the idea of an RTS in this universe, especially since Starcraft is my one of my favourite games of all time. A comparison would be interesting.

I popped the disc into my Xbox 360, played a few missions and was suitably impressed. It suffers from the usual unit selection issues of console RTS games - the options more or less boil down to select one or select all in practical use. However, the game has been designed around this limitation - for example, your base and support buildings are all in one location and when the defence turrets are upgraded enough the base can pretty much look after itself while you take all your units off to fight.

I've encountered some pretty cool missions so far - they're pretty varied in their objectives and the pre-rendered cutscenes in between aren't bad either. However one point puzzles me somewhat...

At the risk of a spoiler (skip to the next paragraph if you don't want to know!), Halo Wars is set 20 years before the first Halo game. At one point in the new game the Flood arrive on the scene, trying to overrun your forces on an unknown planet. Correct me if I'm wrong, but It's my understanding from the first two FPS games that the Flood were contained centuries ago by the Covenant on the Halo that Master Chief has fun on in the first game. The FPS games make no mention they've been encountered before, so their presence in Halo Wars is erroneous. It feels like the developers simply ignored continuity in order to cram all the races into the game.

As for multiplayer, like all games I've little interest in playing against random people on Xbox Live, so unless some of my friends fancy a game I probably won't play.

Overall, this game works well, and counteracts the control problems inherent in console RTS games rather nicely. Perhaps my copy of Halo 3 will finally make its way to my Xbox 360...

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from March 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

February 2009 is the previous archive.

April 2009 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.